Toggle Menu

The mechanism of motion.

There are laws about motion in the Standard Model, but no explanations. Only examples. The same laws apply in the Dynamic Present but here they have an explanation.

Posted 31/5 2016.

The thing about a theory or a hypothesis, or maybe even about a speculation that make you confident about being on the right track is when it deliver answers that not only fit the evidence but also explain the responsible mechanism. The Dynamic Present does that, also when it comes to questions you simply cannot ask the Standard Model. The need for a new paradigm is obvious!

A particle in motion as in Newton's first law will keep moving unless interfered with. This is what the standard model tells us, and that is what happens, but in the standard model a particle is a particle and not a wave, and if there is any "fabric of the universe" nobody knows if it has anything to do with motion. In fact, according to the standard model "inertia" will keep them going for ever without any interaction with what according to the standard model was empty space until the Higgs boson was detected.

In the dynamic present however, dynamic forces that has been present since the Big Bang in the fabric of our universe is what keeps everything in motion while also counting out the short moments of Planck-time duration, which actually is all "time" that exist. Equal to the duration of one cycle of a pulsating oscillation that was induced by the Big Bang event. Everything in our universe is oscillating in resonance with, and driven by these oscillations.
In this scenario everything must accelerate during these short moments of "time", and that include objects moving with a constant speed. However, between moments no motion is possible, so during the second half of each cycle of oscillation the acceleration is directed backwards, slowing down and eventually stopping all objects.
The only outward sign of this acceleration is the property of mass common to all fermions.
A moving object will on top of that build up some extra mass relative to its speed (relativistic mass) due to the directed acceleration of the object in motion.
However, the main mass of all objects comes from the omnidirectional stress/strain oscillations each moment between the center of the object and the surrounding oscillating fabric of the universe. This area of stress/strain grabs a slippery hold of the fabric to an extent proportional to the intensity of the oscillation in question which will bring about a certain resistance against acceleration referred to as the property of inertia.

The interplay between the pulsating cycle of each oscillation of the fabric of the universe and the longitudinal sound-like pulses of an object moving at a constant velocity would be something like the following:
As the cycle of universal oscillation bounce at the minimum volume of the fabric and start to expand, elastic stress and direction induced by the relativistic mass-oscillations of the object and assisted by resonance with the universal oscillations,- will accelerate the object in whatever direction it was moving during the previous half of the universal cycle. As the strain in the elastic fabric then reverts the expansion and the fabric start to contract the rising stress in the fabric brakes the motion of the object while conserving impulse and direction, halting the motion just as the next bounce occur. The process then repeat itself and will continue to do so until the universal oscillations eventually die out when the energy induced at the Big Bang is completely dispersed. (Heat death)

"or continue to move at a constant velocity unless acted upon by a force." How may a force be applied on the moving object in order for it to leave its state of constant velocity?...- And what indeed is a "force"?
The simple answer is energy with a certain direction. In general from interactions with another fermion or a boson or, in the case of gravitation, magnetism and electricity, from interactions directly with fermion induced oscillations that are overlaid one way or the other on the background oscillations of the fabric of the universe.
The easiest way to illustrate this is by explaining how gravitation works:
The oscillation of a fermion pulls in a little extra fabric from the surrounding fabric as the general strain makes the total fabric of the universe shrink towards a bounce. The larger a collection of fermions you have, the more of the surrounding fabric is being pulled in. Any fermion sitting in that fabric will then just follow it along step by step towards the center of the collection of fermions without the need of any acceleration, each instant of the dynamic present moment finding it a bit closer to that center.
That was interactions with the surrounding fabric. Magnetism and electricity also sit in the surrounding fabric and works in a similar way but would generally cause acceleration forces due to the "inertia" of the interacting participants. That would also be the result in case of a direct collision with another fermion or boson.
So, how do we interpret this? The way I see it this "force" is just an "extra" tension in the elastic fabric of the fermion, but this one has a direction which it adds to the omnidirectional (spherical) oscillation of the participating fermions and to any involved bosons, making them move in a different direction with a different speed.

Finally.. quantum uncertainty is not a mystery anymore as may be inferred from the above and from all the other essays on this site. The uncertainty in position and time is due to the rather violent background oscillations of the fabric of our universe and nothing else.

[ Back to top ]

© 2015 Bo Nyberg Template designed by David Miller Background starfield designed by Background Labs