fermion is at rest with respect to this page. Click and drag
your pointer in the picture to make it move or reload the
page to stop it.
The Standard Model, unlike the Dynamic Present, does not
incorporate any background "fabric" like those of the aether
theories. That is the reason so many questions now are
starting to pile up. Some questions are connected to each
other by a common factor which must be clearly identified and
understood before any answers make sense.
I suggest that this common factor is a physically interactive
scene and that the simple remedy is to bring back the classic
aether again. This time however with a slight twist, the
reason for which the 19th century aether physicists was
They did not know about the Big Bang which only came about
after the aether idea had already been abandoned due to
The Dynamic Present has only one component which is a very
elastic aether. This elasticity, when exited by the Big Bang
incident, converts all the fabric of our universe into space
and time by making the bulk universe oscillate quite rapidly
between states of high and low pressure. These bulk volume
oscillations is the main ingredient of "time". The duration of
one such oscillation from low pressure to high pressure and
back to low pressure is known as "Planck time" and it is the
shortest time-span in existence. Short as it is, it still has
duration, 5.4 x 10ˉ⁴⁴ s, which is the time it takes to
complete one full cycle of the bulk universe oscillation.
Better known as the "present moment".
Seen this way "time" becomes a sequence of discontinuous
rhythmic oscillations of the volume of the universe where,
during each new oscillation, elastic forces may direct and
guide the motion of embedded oscillations. Since the direction
and intensity of these elastic forces will be updated during
the course of each successive oscillation the idea of a block
universe become obsolete.
The Dynamic Present also maintain a persistent direction from
the compressed volume at the high pressure turnaround to the
expanded volume at the low pressure turnaround. This allows a
particle (which is nothing else
but a vibration in the
local fabric) to move in any direction thanks to the
oscillations. It also enables the omnidirectional character of
the physical laws.
Furthermore, the oscillations being rhythmic eventually makes
all fabric oscillate in step so that each new instant of the
present is shared simultaneously everywhere in the universe,
thus enabling the "spooky action at a distance" just as
This "time" is however a universal absolute Newtonian time
ticking away in absolute space. And its 5.4 x 10ˉ⁴⁴ s
long(short?) duration of continually recycled simultaneity is
actually the only "physical" time that exist. To understand
Einsteins version of time we have to get a new grip on the
physics of motion. That will enable us to see what may cause
the strictly local notion of time in Special Relativity.
To gain a better understanding of motion let's return to the
oscillating fermion above and set it in motion. What happens
then is that the "push" of your pointer will move the fermion
a little in the direction of the push as it oscillates from
high pressure towards low pressure (red to blue). At the
turnaround where the tensile stress start to pull back the
fermion-wave, the bounce will not be directed directly back to
the center of oscillation but to a new center a little in the
direction of the push.
As a help to imagine this,
think of a large mirror placed flat on the floor. Drop a
small bounce-ball on the mirror and watch it bounce. Imagine
that the mirror is a plane through the middle of a fermion
and that the ball and its reflection represent the fermion
first in the low tensile state(blue color) = before the
"bounce" occur as you drop it and then in high pressure
state(red color) = as it bounce at the mirror and is sent
back towards the(blue color) tensile "bounce" again. Imagine
then that rather then just dropping the ball you also give
it a slight sideways shove. The difference in angle from
bouncing straight up and down is what might be named the
"reflection angle" of the moving fermion. It is a bit
difficult to see and explain about in the bouncing model
When you push on the fermion you alter its reflection angle.
You might make it lager, smaller or point it in a new
If you keep pushing as the oscillation continue, now going
from low pressure back to high pressure (blue to red) you will
experience the phenomenon of inertia when the shrinking
fermion oppose your push.
However, when you stop pushing the fermion it will just keep
moving, -bouncing back and forth between the frames of the
picture, as well as conserving the reflection angle while
bouncing between the high and low pressure states, not unlike
a basket player bouncing the ball while running. This motion
will continue for as long as the pink/light-blue background
oscillations are driving the oscillations of the resonating
Since the fermion now is moving it must have left Newtonian
absolute time and become subject to relativistic time.
What then could have the effect of slowing down absolute time?
Especially since it seems quite clear that "time" is only a
periodic change of the volume of the entire universe.
The period of the oscillation cycle did not change. It is the
same as it was when the fermion did not move, so it appears
instead that motion makes less of the cycle of oscillation
available to any clock the traveling fermion might bring
along. Therefore, the oscillations of absolute space will
continue unaffected at 5.4 x 10ˉ⁴⁴ s, but the clock of the
traveling fermion will need a comparably larger number of
cycles to run then it required before it was set in motion.
What is causing this? Very schematic and simple, think of a
clock as one fermion circulating another. The number of
oscillation cycles needed to complete one revolution for the
circulating fermion depend on the available amplitude of the
oscillations which in turn depend on the tension in the fabric
of the aether.
When they are in motion the stretch induced by the push that
started the motion is conserved in the form of the reflection
angle by the resonating oscillations which means that since
the tension in the fabric now is higher, the amplitude
available to run the clock will be smaller and more cycles
will therefore be needed in order to complete the revolution.
The clock will for this reason run slower when it is in motion
And time? Absolute and relative time are just convenient names
for local dynamic(stress/strain) aftereffects of the universal
oscillations. The first universal and undetectable and the
second effect local and unavoidable.
In this scenario the acceleration is caused by a push.
The more persistent a push the higher resulting speed. In
order to accelerate the fermion the push is stretching the
aether fabric little by little each oscillation until the
pushing is ended and resonance take over, leaving the fermion
coasting at constant speed.
The acceleration takes place during the expanding phase as
described above. The other half of the cycle the volume is
contracting, making the fabric oppose the push, resulting in
the phenomenon of inertia. What if we only delivered the push
during the expanding phase? Then we would not experience any
inertia. Similar to falling in a gravitation field. Here the
push is however replaced by a pull by which the aether fabric
is pulled towards a large collection of fermions like for
example a planet. Since all fermions oscillate in phase, a
planetary collection resonating at close quarters will pull in
and slack out the surrounding aether fabric each oscillation,
stretching the aether fabric in any fermion entering by
pulling on the fabric instead of pushing the fermion. Since
this additional pull is synchronized with the oscillation
cycle inertia only makes itself known when the surface of the
planet stops the accelerating fermion.
[ Back to top ]